Review the resources regarding the Liebeck v. McDonald’s case. Think about what you learned about torts in this unit. If you were a member of the jury, would you have decided for Liebeck or for McDonald’s? Be sure to support your position with citation to authority and the elements of negligence.
Regardless of whether you are an attorney arguing in court or a business stakeholder pitching to shareholders or a potential client, adding support for your argument from appropriate resources strengthens your content. For this discussion board, be sure to include a citation to an appropriate source that supports the point you are makinghis link is to an article about the Liebeck v. McDonald’s case. You should review this for the discussion board. Note that there is a video embedded at the end of the article. In the video, Mrs. Liebeck’s burns are briefly shown. Viewing the video is not required.
- The McDonald’s hot coffee case. (n.d). Consumer Attorneys of California.
This link is to another article regarding the Liebeck v. McDonald’s case. You should read this to assist with the discussion board.
- Weiman, D.S., M.D., J.D. (2018, January 7). The McDonalds’ coffee case. Huffpost
Do you have a similar assignment and would want someone to complete it for you? Click on the ORDER NOW option to get instant services at essayloop.com
Do you have a similar assignment and would want someone to complete it for you? Click on the ORDER NOW option to get instant services at essayloop.com. We assure you of a well written and plagiarism free papers delivered within your specified deadline.