GEOL 101 – Physical Geology – SCC Lab: Earthquakes Name__________________________ Part 1: Determining the timing, location and magnitude of earthquakes. • • Refer to the Instruction Sheet on Determining the Epicenter, Magnitude and Timing to complete these questions. Show your work, as applicable, on the figures in this lab. 1. Look at the three seismograms in Figure 3, and fill in the table for each seismic station. Use a straight edge to try to get an accurate estimate of the arrival times. Use the vertical scale on the seismograms to estimate the height of the S-waves. P-wave arrival time S-wave arrival time Lag time Amplitude of between P and tallest S-wave (mm) S-waves Ellensburg Portland Bellingham 2. Using the time-travel graph (Figure 2) determine the distance from each seismograph to the epicenter. Ellensburg ________km Portland ________km Bellingham ________km 3. Follow the instructions for Location of Epicenter. Using a drafting compass, determine the location of the epicenter on the map of Washington (figure 4). Use the scale below the map to measure the distances on the map. Draw a star (*) on figure 4 to show the approximate location of the epicenter. 4. Follow the instructions for Origin Time. At what time did the earthquake occur? Show your work. You only need to use one seismogram. 5. Follow the instructions for Magnitude of Earthquake. What was the Richter Magnitude of the earthquake? Use the amplitude from the nearest station. Show your work on figure 5 and write your answer here. 6. Briefly summarize how you find the distance to an epicenter (in your words). 7. What else do you need to know to find the location of the epicenter? 1 GEOL 101 – Physical Geology – SCC Figure 2 Time-travel graph for P and S waves. Use ruler or other straight edge to find time lag. Make sure ruler is vertical. 60 Time (seconds) 50 40 30 S-wave P-wave 20 10 0 0 50 100 150 Distance (km) 2 200 250 GEOL 101 – Physical Geology – SCC Figure 3. Seismograms for an earthquake in the Pacific Northwest. Use ruler or other straight edge to get an accurate reading of arrival time and amplitude. Use the amplitude scale shown on this figure. 20 mm Amplitude ELLENSBURG 20 mm 4:34:00 4:33:30 4:33:00 4:32:30 4:32:15 20 mm Time Amplitude PORTLAND 20 mm 4:34:00 4:33:30 4:33:00 4:32:30 4:32:15 20 mm Time Amplitude BELLINGHAM 3 4:34:00 4:33:30 Time 4:33:00 4:32:30 4:32:15 20 mm GEOL 101 – Physical Geology – SCC Figure 4. Map of seismograph locations. Use a compass to find the epicenter and make a star on the map at the epicenter. Use the SCALE below the map to set your compass the correct distance. Ellensburg SCALE 0 km 80 km 200 km 400 km Figure 5. Richter nomogram for determining magnitude of an earthquake. Show your work on this figure to receive full credit. 4 GEOL 101 – Physical Geology – SCC Part 2. Magnitude and Intensity Earthquake Magnitude. Each earthquake has a single Magnitude that is determined by knowing the distance from a seismograph to an earthquake and observing the maximum signal amplitude recorded on the seismograph.To determine earthquake magnitude, we used the largest recorded amplitude for S-waves in this lab. Earthquake Intensity. The intensity of earthquake shaking at any location is determined not only by the magnitude of the earthquake and its distance, but also by the type of underlying rock or unconsolidated materials. If buildings are present, the size and type of buildings (and their inherent natural vibrations) are also important. Therefore, the intensity varies at different locations for a single earthquake. Intensity scales were first used in the late 19th century, and then adapted in the early 20th century to form what we know call the modified Mercalli Intensity scale (Table 1). Intensity estimates are important because they allow us to characterize parts of any region into areas that are especially prone to strong shaking versus those that are not. The key factor in this regard is the nature of the underlying geological materials, and the weaker those are, the more likely it is that there will be strong shaking. Areas underlain by strong solid bedrock tend to experience much less shaking than those underlain by unconsolidated river or lake sediments. 8. Estimating Intensity from Personal Observations. Use this description of the Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale which defines Earthquake Intensity (CIIM) values, given in Roman Numerals from I to IV, based on the description of the earthquake impact at a location. https://www.usgs.gov/media/images/modified-mercalli-intensity-mmi-scale-assigns-intensities Table 1 (below) summarizes the observations made by residents of the Nanaimo (British Columbia) area during the M6.8 Nisqually earthquake near Olympia, Washington, in 2001. Complete Table 1 by writing the appropriate Intensity (use Roman Numerals) that corresponds to the observations. 5 GEOL 101 – Physical Geology – SCC Table 1. Complete this table by writing the appropriate Earthquake Intensity. Refer to Table 2 for Intensity Values and Descriptions. Building Type Floor Shaking Felt Lasted (seconds) House 1 no 10 Heard a large rumble lasting not even 10 s, mirror swayed House 2 moderate 60 Candles, pictures and CDs on bookshelf moved, towels fell off racks House 1 no Pots hanging over stove moved and crashed together weak Rolling feeling with a sudden stop, picture fell off mantle, chair moved House 1 Description of Motion Apartment 1 weak 10 Sounded like a big truck then everything shook for a short period House 1 moderate 20-30 Teacups rattled but didn’t fall off Institution 2 moderate 15 Creaking sounds, swaying movement of shelving 15-30 Bed banging against the wall with me in it, dog barking aggressively House 1 moderate 6 Intensity Generalized Geologic Setting of the Pacific Northwest Part 1: Earthquakes Part 2: Subduction-zone Volcanism The Pacific Northwest comprises many diverse geologic settings. Here we focus mainly on the subduction zone (coast to Cascade Mountains) because that is where most of the earthquakes and volcanoes occur, and where tsunamis can be generated. Material on the following pages was gathered from the Pacific Northwest Seismograph Network (www.pnsn.org/), the U.S. Geological Survey (www.usgs.gov), and from two books: Orphan Tsunami of 1700*, by Brian Awtater and others, and At Risk: Earthquakes and Tsunamis on the West Coast¨** by John Clague and others. *Brian F. ATWATER, MUSUMI-ROKKAKU Satoko, SATAKE Kenji, TSUJI Yoshinobu, UEDA Kazue, and David K. YAMAGUCHI, 2005, The Orphan Tsunami of 1700—Japanese Clues to a Parent Earthquake in North America; University of Washington Press **John Clague, Chris Yorath, Richard Franklin, and Bob Turner, 2006, At Risk: Earthquakes and Tsunamis on the West Coast; Tricouni Press ANIMATION RESOURCES for the Pacific NW—Compare the PNW with Sumatra & more Interactive Animations www.iris.edu/hq/programs/education_and_outreach/animations/interactive Plate Boundaries www.iris.edu/hq/programs/education_and_outreach/animations/11 Geology of the Pacific Northwest 1 Part 1: Earthquakes in the Pacific Northwest Vancouver Island 2 TOTLE workshop Figure 1 (above): USGS map of the Pacific Northwest geologic setting. Green area is the sloping subduction zone that ruptured during the great earthquake of 1700. The line of contact between the Juan de Fuca and North American plates on the surface is on the western edge of the green area. (See also Figure 6 to put earthquakes on this map.) Figure 2 (below): USGS map from Hyndman and Wang, 1995, shows the shallow locked portion of the Cascadia Subduction Zone fault and the deeper transitional zone where small earthquake clusters sometimes occur. ing ridg e Locked Transitional e ing ridg 3. Within the down-going Juan de Fuca Plate beneath the North American Plate. 1700 EQ Rupture zone Spr ead 2. Along the subduction zone fault between the two plates, sometimes called the interplate thrust or megathrust fault; and Orange is young volcanic deposits; red triangles are the peaks. Cascadia subduction zone. Juan de Fuca plate on west; North American plate is to the right of the red line. Arrows point in direction the ocean plate is diving. Spr ead 1. Within the deforming part of the North American plate; Spr ead ing The Cascadia Subduction Zone (figure 1) is a very long sloping fault stretching from mid-Vancouver Island to Northern California. This subduction zone is where the Juan de Fuca oceanic plate meets the continental part of the North American Plate in the Pacific Northwest. New ocean floor is being created offshore of Washington and Oregon at the Juan de Fuca Ridge where seafloor spreading occurs between the Pacific and Juan de Fuca plates. As the Juan de Fuca Ridge moves away from the ridge, material wells up along the spreading ridge creating new oceanic crust. A very different type of magma rises beneaath the North America Plate forming the Cascade Range (See Subduction Zone Volcanism on page 11) . The width of the Cascadia Subduction Zone fault varies along its length (figure 2), depending on the angle at which the oceanic plate is subducting. At shallow depths along this fault, rocks are relatively cold and brittle so they can store up elastic energy until they rupture in an earthquake. This shallow part of the Cascadia Subduction Zone fault is often referred to as the “locked” zone because it generally stores up elastic energy for centuries and then ruptures to produce very large earthquakes. At increased depths along this fault, rocks become hotter and more plastic, although they can probably also rupture to release of elastic energy during great earthquakes. As a result of the compression between the Juan de Fuca and North American plates at the Cascadia subduction zone, the continent overlying the subduction zone is actively deforming. Earthquakes in the Pacific Northwest are generally thought to occur in three different parts of the Cascadia subduction zone (figure 3): ridg e Cascadia Subduction Zone http://www.pnsn.org/INFO_GENERAL/platecontours.html Figure 3: Cross section of seismicity in the continental North America Plate and in the subducting oceanic Juan de Fuca Plate Figure 4: Descriptions of the Juan de Fuca Ridge and the Cascade Range. Water from the subducting oceanic plate causes melting of hot mantle rocks above the subducting plate. The resulting magma rises into the overlying North American continental crust. Some of this magma erupts as ash or lava from Cascade volcanoes. Modified from Lynn Topinka, USGS/CVO, 1999, which was modified from Brantley, 1994, Volcanoes of the United States Geology of the Pacific Northwest 3 Earthquakes in the Pacific Northwest The Pacific Northwest (PNW) is an active seismic area with three distinct types of earthquakes and additional “slow-slip events” (figure 5). Subduction-zone earthquakes, which can be as large as magnitude 9.0 (M9.0), recur every few hundred years on the shallow part of the Cascadia Subduction Zone fault that lies off the coast of Washington and Oregon. Deep earthquakes of M6 to M7 recur every 30 years or so within the subducting Juan de Fuca Plate beneath western Washington. Earthquakes on faults within the crust in the Pacific Northwest are a hazard to major urban centers like the Seattle and Portland metropolitan areas. Although recurrence times are poorly known, crustal earthquakes are possible across much of Washington and Oregon, including areas east of the Cascades. Small crustal earthquakes often precede volcanic activity and were used to forecast eruptions at Mount St. Helens in the 1980s. Each year, the Pacific Northwest Seismic Network records several dozen felt earthquakes and thousands of smaller earthquakes — ongoing reminders of the earthquake hazards in Washington and Oregon. Figure 5. The circles on the cross-section diagram show positions of earthquakes relative to the Juan de Fuca and North American plates. Types of earthquakes in the Pacific Northwest: Crustal earthquakes — Shallow earthquakes (less than 15 miles deep) occur on faults within the North American continental crust. The Seattle fault produced a shallow magnitude 7+ earthquake 1,100 years ago. Other strong to major (M6 to M7) crustal earthquakes occurred in 1872, 1918, and 1946. Subduction zone —(Red zone: Juan de Fuca–North America plate boundary) Huge earthquakes (>M8) occur when the boundary between the oceanic and continental plates ruptures to release large amounts of stored elastic energy. In 1700, the most recent great Cascadia Subduction Zone earthquake sent a tsunami across the Pacific Ocean to Japan. This subduction zone fault is similar to the fault that ruptured to produce the Sumatra – Andaman earthquake and the Indian Ocean tsunami that killed 250,000 people in December 2004. For the Pacific Northwest, a repeat of the 1700 great Cascadia Subduction Zone earthquake would definitely be “The Big One”. Deep earthquakes —These strong to major earthquakes occur about 40 miles below the Earth’s surface within the subducting Juan de Fuca oceanic plate as it bends and dives beneath the North American continental plate. Deep earthquakes occurred in 1949 (M7.1), 1965 (M6.5), and 2001 (M6.8; Nisqually). The 1949 earthquake caused over $100 million in damage, including damage to the Capitol Building in Olympia. The 1965 earthquake caused over $50 million in damage. As population has increased in the Puget Sound area, the cost of damage from these earthquakes has increased dramatically. Damage from the 2001 Nisqually earthquake was about $2.5 billion. Slow-slip events — During slow-slip events that last for seven to ten days, the Juan de Fuca plate slips further into the mantle underlying the North American continental crust. Slow-slip events do not produce violent seismic waves like typical earthquakes. Instead they cause tremors of Earth’s surface like the vibration of a drumhead. These events occur about every 14 months, are sometimes called “Episodic Tremor and Slip”, and are the subject of EarthScope research (See green box at right). 4 TOTLE workshop Hot Recent PNW topic “Episodic Tremor & Slip” (ETS) An article published in onSite, an EarthScope quarterly, describes the process. To see just the article: TOUCH HERE to go to Page 11 of this document How big are subduction-zone earthquakes? Great subduction zone earthquakes are the largest earthquakes in the world and can exceed magnitude 9.0. Earthquake magnitude is proportional to the fault area that ruptures to produce the earthquake. The Cascadia Subduction Zone fault stretches from mid-Vancouver Island to Northern California. Because the fault area is very large, the Cascadia Subduction Zone can produce great earthquakes of magnitude 9.0 or higher, if rupture occurred over its entire area. The most famous subduction-zone earthquakes occurred in Alaska, Chile, and Sumatra. How often do Cascadia subduction-zone quakes occur? Geological evidence (see next page) indicates that great Cascadia Subduction Zone earthquakes have occurred at least seven times in the last 3,500 years with intervals between great earthquakes ranging from about 200 to almost 1000 years. The last great Cascadia earthquake occurred just over 300 years ago during the evening of January 26, 1700. Plus, GPS evidence shows the coastline along Vancouver Island, Washington, and to a slightly lesser extent, Oregon is being pushed to the northeast at a steady rate. This indicates that we should prepare ourselves for a large earthquake. Figure 6. Active continental margin: Cascadian earthquakes, volcanic edifices and faults. Unresolved questions being studied in the Pacific N.W.: 1. Because the Juan de Fuca plate is moving northeast toward North America, one would expect the orientation of compressional stress across the Pacific Northwest to be northeast – southwest. However, there are additional components of stress that change in strength and direction from place to place within the Pacific Northwest. These additional stresses are not well understood and are the subject of current research. 2. A very unusual aspect of the Cascadia subduction zone is that there have been few, if any, instrumentallyrecorded earthquakes along the Cascadia megathrust fault. In combination with the fact that the shallow part of the Cascadia megathrust is located offshore, the lack of recent earthquakes limits our understanding of the mechanics of this important fault. Can the observed stress field in the Pacific Northwest tell us anything about the fault itself? In light of the fact that earthquakes only infrequently occur along the Cascadia megathrust, how is this fault mechanically similar to or different from other major plate boundary faults around the world (e.g., the San Andreas fault)? Ongoing EarthScope research is helping to address these important questions. Geology of the Pacific Northwest 5 January 26, 1700—Cascadia Subduction Zone earthquake and tsunami Crust of Subducting Overriding plate Overriding Dragged Bulges Sudden Uplift Subsidence Betweenplate 9:00 PM andplate 10:00 PM, local time, on January down 26thup1700, a great earthquake shook the Pacific Tsunami Northwest. This quake, with magnitude estimated at 9.0, rocked the region with strong shaking for several long minutes minutes while coastal Washington plummeted as much as 1.5 meters relative to coastal waters. How is it possible to know that an event during pre-written history ever occurred on the Cascadia Subduction, Sea Plate squeezed Plate relaxes let alone to place it within one hour of its occurrence 300 years ago? The evidence speaks for itself: Read steps 1–6 in the figures below: Stuck Plate boundary Unstuck Sliding freely Figure 7A–F. Evidence of the Great Quake of 1700. Images from Brian Atwater’s Orphan Tsunami. Crust of Overriding plate Subducting Land subsides Overriding plate plate(p. 10) during earthquake Dragged down Bulges up 130° Sudden 120° Tsunami 50° Sea Canada U.S.A. Plate squeezed Seaward edge of Cascadia Stuck subduction Sliding freely zone Plate boundary Tide + Uplift Subsidence BRITISH COLUMBIA WASHINGTON Plate relaxes Copalis River Willapa Bay OREGON Unstuck Silt A. LandSoil Levels— PNW geologic evidence (changes in land levels found during geologica mapping) shows that subduction Land subsides Buried soil Cedar 40° Pacific Ocean 50° Spruce Land subsides during earthquake Resistant cedar trunk (examples, opposite) Soil Cedar Spruce Soil Land subsides during earthquake Buried soil Mud — seismic event occurring in the Pacific Northwest. Decayed Sand sheet Tide spruce stump Mud Soil Land subsides Tidal marsh rests Sand intrusion Buried soil Bark preserved (p. 96) Sand liquefies, on loose, wet sand records past land cracks, and shaking. Land subsides Sand-ladenslurry tsunami during earthquakepressurized into subsided crack. overruns (diagram, p. 10) spurts landscape. Mud Marsh Sand Canada U.S.A. Seaward Resistant Bark cedar preserved trunk(p. 96) (examples, Land subsides Sand-laden tsunami opposite) B. Tree Rings Ancient trees, once submerged along during earthquake overruns subsided (diagram, p. 10)beaches, PNW coastal put an accurate date on a likely landscape. Marsh BR 0 ITISH COLUMBIA D. Historicedge Records —+ of 130° Decayed Silt spruce stump Tide Buried soil Tide 120° CALIFORNIA 130° zone earthquakes occur cyclically. during earthquake (p. 10) Sand sheet C. Tsunami Traces—Uncharacteristic sand deposits in coastal soil give evidence of local tsunamis. JapaneseCascadia government subduction (Samurai) records from 1700 zone 50° describe a large tsunami likely originating from the Pacific Northwest. It swept along coast killing 40° the Pacific Ocean villagers. WASHINGTON Copalis River 120° Willapa BayEstuary where sand OREGON liquefied when land suddenly subsided WASH. + CALIFORNIA Grays Harbor 0 ubsides 6 Sand intrusion records past shaking. Columbia 500River km km 0 Deep-sea OREGON channel Sixes River descended by 13 turbidity 120° Pac13 ific0°American E. Native Tales Native currents in the Oc e an 40° past 7,700 stories from the Pacific Northwest years 50° — Estuary where sand 500 liquefied when land suddenly subsided describe an event strikingly similar to a large Cascadia subduction SHAKING A DEEP-SEA DEPOSIT zoneLEAVES quake where rocks rolled + WASH. the mountains and the ocean 1 down River delivers sediment to the sea. the canoes in the 2 put Sediment settles ontrees. the Grays Harbor Columbia River 1 km 0 2 4 continental shelf. Deep-sea OREGON 3channel An earthquake Sixes River F.descended Turbidite Record Layers of sediment off the 3 shakes by the continental 13 turbidity shelf and slope. PNWincoast show that simultaneous Pacwidespread, ific 5 4currents Shakenthe sediment Ocean shaking of the region was very likely. 4 0° past descends 7,700 submarine yearscanyons as turbidity currents. 500 Fault at plate 5 Turbidity currents merge where Read all about it!! boundary tributaries meet. Resulting deposits SHAKING LEAVES A DEEP-SEA DEPOSIT are visible in sediment cores. — Orphan Tsunami, a 144-page (116Mb) book, details 1 River delivers sediment to the sea. this story. You can download for free from: 1 2 Sediment settles on the 3 An earthquake shakes the continental shelf and slope. http://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/pp1707/ 4 continental shelf. Tidal marsh rests TOTLE workshop Sand liquefies, on loose, wet sand land cracks, and 500 km 2 3 More Questions (& Answers) about Earthquakes in Washington and Oregon These questions are from the Pacific Northwest Seismograph Network (with permission from Steve Malone). 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Where are the major faults in the Pacific Northwest? Are there faults near Seattle and Portland? Why does the Pacific Northwest have earthquakes? How often do earthquakes occur in the Pacific Northwest? How many and what size of earthquakes occur near Seattle? How many and what size of earthquakes occur near Portland? Could a big earthquake in California, Alaska, or Japan cause earthquakes in Washington or Oregon? Could bridges collapse due to seismic activity in the Pacific Northwest? Should I buy earthquake insurance for my house? Can earthquakes be predicted? Is one Seattle area neighborhood safer from earthquakes than another? What fault lines pass under Mount Saint Helens? What is the best site for Volcano information? There seems to be a lot of activity on the Webicorders, but there are not any events listed on the “Recent Events” list. What is going on? Answers 1 Where are the major faults in the Pacific NW? A: There are many faults in the Pacific Northwest that can produce damaging earthquakes, including hard-toidentify faults that exist entirely underground and have not been identified at the earth’s surface. At the same time, some mapped faults have been located that have not generated earthquakes in recent geologic time. New faults continue to be discovered as more field observations and earthquake data are collected. There are three different sources for damaging earthquakes in the Pacific Northwest. The first of these is the “Cascadia Subduction Zone”, a 1000 km long thrust fault which is the convergent boundary between the Juan de Fuca and North American plates and is the most extensive fault in the Pacific Northwest area. It surfaces about 50 miles offshore along the coasts of British Columbia, Washington, Oregon and northern California. No historic earthquakes have been directly recorded from this source zone. According to recent research, an earthquake estimated to be as large as 8.0 to 9.0 occurred in this zone in January of 1700. The second source for damaging earthquakes is the Benioff Zone. This zone is the continuation of the extensive faulting that results as the subducting plate is forced into the upper mantle. The Benioff Zone can probably produce earthquakes with magnitudes as large as 7.5. Benioff Zone earthquakes are deeper than 30km. The third source consists of shallow crustal earthquake activity (depths of 0 to 20 km) within the North American continental plate where faulting is extensive. Past earthquakes have revealed many shallow fault structures, including the Western Rainier Seismic Zone and the Mt. St. Helens Seismic Zone. Our best known crustal fault, the Seattle Fault, runs east-west through Seattle from Issaquah to Bremerton. This fault generated a very large earthquake approximately 1100 years ago. Other crustal faults have been located in the Puget Basin region. 2 Are there faults near Seattle and Portland? A: Yes. Some of these are well known from geologic or geophysical surveys. Examples include the Seattle Fault and the Portland Hills Fault. How often earthquakes occur on these faults is not well known, but they are believed to have the potential to produce damaging earthquakes. 3 Why does the Pacific Northwest have earthquakes? A: We are located at a convergent continental boundary, where two tectonic plates are colliding. This boundary is called the Cascadia Subduction Zone. It lies offshore and runs from British Columbia to northern California. The two plates are converging at a rate of about 3-4 cm/year (1-2 inches/year), and the northeast-moving Juan de Fuca Plate is pushing into North America, causing stress to accumulate. Earthquakes are caused by the abrupt release of this slowly accumulated stress. Geology of the Pacific Northwest 7 4 How often do earthquakes occur in the Pacific Northwest? A: Typically, each year we locate over 1000 earthquakes with magnitude 1.0 or greater in Washington and Oregon. Of these, approximately two dozen are large enough to be felt. These felt events offer us a subtle reminder that the Pacific Northwest is an earthquakeprone region. As residents of the Pacific Northwest, we should be prepared for the consequences of larger earthquakes that could result in damage to the transportation systems and lifelines. There have been about 25 damaging earthquakes in Washington and Oregon since 1872. In the 20th century, about 17 people lost their lives due to earthquakes in the Pacific Northwest. 5 How many and what size of earthquakes occur near Seattle? A: In the 20th century, there were eleven earthquakes of magnitude 5 or greater that have occurred near Puget Sound: in 1904 (M 5.3), 1909 (M 6.0), 1932 (M 5.2), 1939 (M 6.2), 1945 (M5.9) 1946 (M 6.4), 1949 (M 7.0), 1965 (M 6.5), 1995 (M 5.0), 1996 (M 5.3), and 1999 (M 5.1). Most of the events are associated with deep Benioff zone earthquake activity that effects the Pacific Northwest Region. The 1995 and 1996 events were shallow crustal events. 6 How many and what size of earthquakes occur near Portland? A: In this century there have been three significant earthquakes near Portland: in 1877 (M 5.3), 1962 (M 5.5), and 1993 (M 5.5). Additionally, Portland has been damaged by earthquakes that occurred in the Puget Sound region, such as the 1949 magnitude 7.1 event near Olympia, WA, and the 1965 magnitude 6.5 event located between Seattle and Tacoma. 7 Could a big earthquake in California, Alaska, or Japan cause earthquakes in Washington or Oregon? A: Historical data and theory suggests that earthquakes only provoke other shocks within a limited area around the fault rupture. Distant earthquakes have no direct effect on Washington and Oregon. Earthquakes in California, Alaska and Japan are caused by the interaction of different plates than the earthquakes in the Pacific Northwest. However, the 1992 Landers earthquake in southern California caused an increase in tiny earthquakes in geothermal areas as far away as The Geysers in northern California. 8 TOTLE workshop 8 Could bridges collapse due to seismic activity in the Pacific Northwest? A: Yes, even modern bridges have sustained damage during earthquakes, leaving them unsafe for use. More rarely, some bridges have failed completely due to strong ground motion. Several collapsed in the Northridge earthquake in January 1994, even though they had been strengthened. The January, 1995 Kobe, Japan earthquake also caused many bridges to fail. It is important to note that both of these earthquakes produced accelerations far exceeding the design criteria used in the design of the failed structures. Because the bridges in our urban areas vary in their size, materials, siting, and design, they will be affected differently by any given earthquake. Major bridge design improvements occurred in the 1970’s. Bridges built before the mid 1970’s have a significantly higher risk of suffering structural damage during a moderate to large earthquake compared with those built after 1980. The 1970’s was a decade of evolution for bridge design, so bridges built during this time may or may not have these improvements. Much of the interstate highway system in the Pacific Northwest has been built in the mid to late 1960’s. The Washington State Department of Transportation should be consulted for further information about the seismic resistance of individual structures maintained by the state. Many other bridges are under other jurisdictions, but most have been evaluated. 9 Should I buy earthquake insurance for my house? A: That is an individual decision, which depends on the risk that homeowners are financially willing to take. It also depends on their confidence in the quality of their homes, since there is quite a large deductible on most policies. Commonly the policies only pay for damage exceeding 5 to 10% of the value of a house. Some seismologists do have earthquake insurance. 10 Can earthquakes be predicted? A: Although scientists have long tried to predict earthquakes, no reliable method has been discovered. Seismicity in the Pacific Northwest has only been extensively studied for a couple of decades, and seismologists are still trying to understand the frequency and hazards of earthquakes in our region. . 11 Is one Seattle area neighborhood safer than another? A: There is no Seattle area neighborhood that is immune from possible earthquake damage. The age of the structure and the type of geology in the area are two factors that will affect the vulnerability to earthquakes. There are ways to perform a seismic retrofit on older homes. The Project Impact web page has information on home retrofits. Another valuable resource is the Cascadia Regional Earthquake Workgroup (CREW). The American Red Cross has a variety of earthquake preparedness publications. 12 What fault lines pass under Mt. Saint Helens? A: Mt. Saint Helens is located on the St. Helens Fault Zone (SHZ). This is a strike-slip fault. Right at Mount St. Helens there is a gap and a step in the SHZ. This step causes the crust to pull apart inside the gap, creating a zone of weakness where volcanic material can more easily reach the surface. It will help you to understand this if you draw some pictures of a step in a strike-slip fault, with arrows to show the direction of movement. Many volcanos are found in similar circumstances. The St. Helens Fault Zone was not discovered until after the eruption of Mt. St. Helens (1980). In 1981 a magnitude 5+ earthquake on the SHZ had thousands of aftershocks which “lit up” the fault. 14 There seems to be a great deal of activity on the webicorders, but there are not any events listed on the “Recent Events” list. What is going on? A: Only earthquakes with magnitudes greater than 1.5 are on the list of recent events. It is possible that several earthquakes have taken place that were all of magnitude less than 1.5. Also, it takes the seismology lab time to analyze each earthquake and properly determine its magnitude. Some smaller events in the magnitude 2 range may not be posted on the list until three days after they occur. There is also the large possibility that the activity on webicorders is not seismic. Weather conditions such as wind and heavy rain will cause plenty of spikes and glitches. The instrument that is producing unusual signals may be broken. Outages in our network can last hours, days, or months, depending on the cause of the failiure and our ability to access the instrument. Some instruments are at high elevations or remote locations, and fixing them takes longer than other, easier to access instruments. The PNSN has more than 150 stations. Temporary problems with a few stations at any given time will not interfere with our ability to identify and analyze seismic activity in the Pacific Northwest. 13 What is the best web site for Volcano information? A: The best site for information about volcanoes in the Pacific Northwest is the Cascade Volcanic Observatory (CVO). In addition, the University of Washington has a Volcanoes web page. The Smithsonian also has an excellent website of World Volcanoes. Geology of the Pacific Northwest 9 featured science: 3 Episodic Tremor and Slip in the SuggestPacific A Site . . . Northwest * When will the Transportable Array be in my friend’s community? featured science: Episodic Tremor and Slip in the Pacific Northwest (continued from front) 14 months the Pacific Northwest experiences slow slip on side a fault thatpage) is As Every the Transportable Array continues the bottom left-hand of the the equivalent of about a magnitude 6.5 earthquake. While a typical earthquake its journey from the west to east, you might to identify the suggested location on the of thiswhen magnitude happens in less than 10 seconds, duration of these slip wonder it will arrive in a friend’s map. the Placing a marker will automatically events is two to several weeks. The most recent event occurred from January 14 will or family member’s neighborhood. You open the site suggestion form, which through 2007. can find outFebruary by going1,to our “Suggest slide open on the right-hand side of the A Site”Inweb at www.iagt.org/ map. Or you can click on the ‘Show thepage Pacific earthscope/suggestasite/. Panel’ tab, located in the upper right Northwest, the Juan de Zoom to a place by entering an address, a zip corner of the map to display the site Fuca plate is subducting code, a city and state (City, suggestion form. Next, fill in the required (or dipping) beneath the State), or a latitude and longitude (xx, yy) in the information (denoted with an *) on the North American plate box at the top of California the map and then click site suggestion form and click the ‘Send from northern theto“Zoom to Location” your Suggestion to EarthScope’ button Vancouver Island. button. Or you can use the zoom and directional tools at the bottom of the form. Only locations These plates slide past at each the bottom the page within the blue circle – or buffer zone other of along the to go directly Figure 1. Courtesy of H. Dragert, Geological Survey of Canada you to solid your location of interest. This web – will be accepted. The information green, dashed application can be used learn enter will subduction be sent to the Transportable yellow and dashed redtolines in where Figure 1. The Cascadia zone, as it is future stations will be located or where Array Office in Socorro, New called, experiences large earthquakes, perhaps as Coordinating large as the 2004 Sumatra current stations are installed. Justyears click on on average. Mexico, forone consideration. earthquake, once every 500 The last was about The 300 “Suggest years ago in January 1700. The slip during these earthquakes, occurring on the “locked” zone in the figure, is thought to accommodate most, if not all, of the relative motion between the North American plate and the Juan de Fuca plate. Down dip of this locked zone (red dashed lines), the plates must still slide past each other. However, instead of rupturing in devastating earthquakes, much of that slip appears to be occurring during the Episodic Tremor and Slip (ETS) events (labeled “slip” in the figure). EarthScope and other research projects have installed Global Positioning System (GPS) stations near the Northwest Pacific coast to record ETS events. These instruments are continuously moving to the northeast relative to the stable interior of North America because the Juan de Fuca plate is pushing on the North American plate (green arrow in Figure 1). During an ETS event, the stations above the ETS zone slip backwards (the red arrows in the figure). Seismometers also record the slip. These signals initially were considered to be noise from wind or other sources, however, by filtering and analyzing the seismograms, it was discovered that tremor produces signals that are similar on many seismometers and that the signals move across a network of seismometers at the speed of waves generated by earthquakes. Tremors typically originate where the two plates meet at depths of 30-45 km. These tremors may be related to high fluid pore pressure in the rock resulting from dehydration reactions as the subducting plate heats up and undergoes increasing pressure. One of the most exciting areas of research to emerge from joint GPS and seismic monitoring is the discovery of ETS. Japanese researchers were the first to identify periodic slip events, however, with the installation of more GPS stations, this phenomena has been detected in Cascadia and many other subduction zonesAaround the world. In Cascadia,by IAGT a red balloon-shaped marker (a station Site” application, developed recognition of slow faultingweekly led that is operating or being constructed) or initial for EarthScope, is updated to the identification of eight additional a blue balloon-shaped marker (a future with current data and offers a fun and events with a regular station) for more information. As you convenient way 14-month to exploreperiodicity our network of and the forecasting of futureStations. events. zoom in on an area, the blue markers are Earthquake Monitoring replaced with blue circles to indicate the Since then, five predicted events have this application by with us theimprove same periodicity. area within which a future station will be occurredHelp providing your suggestions Bill Schultz, Further study has shown that ETS to events placed. If you know someone who may IAGT “Suggest Site” manager, at likely occur all alongAthe Cascadia be interested in hosting an Earthquake bschultz@iagt.org to Perle Dorr, onSite subduction zone but withordifferent Monitoring Station, you can let us know Figure 2. Plot of East-West position vs time for co-editor, dorr@iris.edu. periodicity (see at Figure 2.). For example, using thissites application. Use theare “marker” 23 GPS (eastward motions positive). ETS events occur beneath Northern The blue vertical the lines “marker”, mark ETS events tool (to activate clickwhere the Matt11 Mercurio, Institute for the multiple stations temporarily move westward. CaliforniaBy every months and off the labeled icon with the green balloon on Application of Geospatial Technology. ■ (continued on page 3) * From EarthScope’s OnSite Newsletter winter/spring 2007 10 TOTLE workshop coast of central Oregon approximately every 18 months. The 2007 ETS event began under the southern Puget Sound area to the southwest of Seattle and propagated north northwest into Vancouver Island, Canada at a rate of 10 km per day (Figure 3). Over a three-week period, it is estimated that there was 3 cm of slip and that the amount of energy released was equivalent to a magnitude 6.6 earthquake. An account of this event and two previous ETS events as they unfolded can be found at http://www. pnsn.org/WEBICORDER/DEEPTREM/ fall2006.html. These ETS events can effect the magnitude and timing of future large earthquakes within the subduction zone and thus are important in advancing our understanding of the seismic hazards in the region. As more GPS, strainmeters and seismometers are installed in Cascadia and near other subduction zones, it is hoped that answers to many more questions about these events will be found. Time of Tremor Event Millimeters of Slip Figure 3. From January 14, 2007 until February 2, 2007, tremor migrated from the south Puget Sound region to southern Vancouver Island at about 10 km per day (colored dots). Amount of slip is inferred from GPS data. By Kenneth C. Creager, Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of Washington, and Timothy I. Melbourne, Department of Geological Sciences, Central Washington University. ■ Part 2: Subduction Zone Volcanism* Subduction zones recycle oceanic crust back into the mantle If new crust continually forms along mid-ocean ridges and then spreads away from the ridges (Figure 4), where does it go? One possibility entertained by a few scientists was that the Earth was expanding over time and seafloor spreading resulted from this expansion. Much evidence weighed against this expansion model, and the correct interpretation is that oceanic crust and the top of the underlying mantle eventually sink back into Earth’s interior along what are known as subduction zones. Subduction zones were first recognized as regions of frequent, powerful earthquakes arranged in inclined sheets extending far into the mantle from near the surface. The shallow ends of these sheets of earthquakes begin beneath the oceans, commonly near the submarine valleys or “trenches” that run parallel to the margins of some continents and volcanic island chains. The earthquakes are deeper in the mantle at greater distances away from the trench in the direction of the continent or island chain. Rocks have to be relatively cold to crack and create earthquakes (if hot, they bend easily and flow, like stiff clay), so the inclined sheets of earthquakes show the locations of cold slabs of rock that penetrate into the mantle, beginning at the deep ocean trenches. Scientists have since gathered much additional evidence that oceanic crust eventually sinks back down (subducts) into the mantle. Because of the relative motion of the plates, subduction zones are sometimes referred to as convergent plate boundaries. The deadly Indian Ocean tsunami of December 26, 2004, resulted from faulting and a powerful earthquake along the subduction zone adjacent to the island of Sumatra, Indonesia. Subduction Zones—Homes for the Second-Most Abundant Volcanoes on Earth Subduction zones are home for the second most abundant volcanoes on Earth, and these are the most important for people because of the hazards they pose and also because they create watersheds, fertile soils, recreation areas, and many ore deposits. At subduction zones, active volcanoes are lined up along the margin of the non-subducting plate (sometimes referred to as the overriding or upper plate, or in miner’s terms the “hanging wall”). The upper plate can be made of either continental or oceanic crust. Subductionzone volcanoes encircle much of the rim of the Pacific Ocean, forming what is known poetically as the Ring of Fire. The Ring of Fire includes the active volcanoes of the Andes and Central America, the Cascades (Figure 9; northern California to southern British Columbia), the Aleutians (Alaska), Kamchatka and the Kuriles Russia), Japan, the Philippines, the island chains of Tonga and Kermadec extending south to New Zealand, and a branch forming the Izu-Bonin and Marianas island chains (southwest Pacific). Along the Ring of Fire, oceanic crust subducts beneath most of the landmasses surrounding the Pacific Ocean. This contrasts with the Atlantic Ocean where subduction only takes place in small areas along the Lesser Antilles (Caribbean) and the South Sandwich Islands (between South America and Antarctica). Another major area of subduction zone volcanoes is in Java and Sumatra (Indonesia), due to subduction of the Indian Ocean seafloor. Water Induces the Melting of Rocks Deep below Subduction-Zone Volcanoes Figure 8. Ocean-continent subduction zone. The lithospheric (aka tectonic) plate is comprised of the crust and upper mantle (green zone). Different subducting plates dive into the mantle at different slopes and sink to increasing depths away from the plate boundary (illustrate this by slowly sliding a sheet of paper off the edge of your desk). The volcanoes usually sit in a line above where the subducting plate passes through about 100 kilometers (60 miles) depth in the Earth. Depending on the subducted plate’s steepness, this line of volcanoes can be close to (steeply dipping plate), or far from (gently dipping plate), where the oceanic plate starts to descend into the mantle. The earliest * From: VOLCANISM IN A PLATE TECTONIC PERSPECTIVE, By Tom Sisson. in the USGS publication: Living with a Volcano in your Backyard — An Educator’s Guide with Emphasis on Mount Rainier, by Carolyn Driedger. Download entire guide: http://vulcan.wr.usgs.gov/Outreach/Publications/GIP19/framework.html Geology of the Pacific Northwest 11 theory for the origin of subduction-zone volcanoes was that the sinking plate releases water as it warms up in the mantle (think of the plate as sweating). This water causes small amounts of melting in the hotter rocks of the nearby mantle. These low-density basaltic magmas then rise toward the surface. Some of these basaltic magmas feed volcanoes directly, but most basaltic magmas cool to varying degrees and shed dense crystals, thereby changing in chemical composition to andesitic and dacitic magmas. Hot basaltic magmas may also incorporate and melt rocks from the crust, leading to similar or greater changes in composition and thus in density, viscosity, and temperature. An alternate theory is that the subducting plate itself heats up enough to melt by small amounts, creating magmas that rise to the surface. Because it is conceptually easy, this idea of plate melting is commonly presented in introductory science textbooks; however, calculations of the temperatures of sinking plates have long shown that the plates do not generally get hot enough to melt. Notable exceptions are where the subducting plate has only recently formed at a mid-ocean ridge and is still hot when it begins to subduct. Temperatures sufficiently high for melting are also inconsistent with the abundant deep, powerful subduction-zone earthquakes that require rocks to be cold enough to crack. How Adding Water Melts Hot Rock The ability of water or steam to induce melting in hot mantle rocks is similar in principle to the ability of salt to melt ice on a road or sidewalk. As a rule, adding a chemical substance that can dissolve in a liquid but not in a solid promotes the conversion of the solid to the liquid. Salt will dissolve in water, but practically none can be incorporated into the structure of ice. Adding salt to ice will melt some of the ice, as long as the ice is already close to its melting temperature. Because melting absorbs heat (the atoms need energy to move quickly and freely in a liquid), adding salt to ice also lowers the temperature below the freezing point of fresh water. This is why salt-ice mixtures are used to lower the temperature in old-fashioned ice cream makers. At the high pressures of subduction zones, much water can dissolve in magma, but very little can be absorbed into hot mantle rocks. The release of water from the subducting plate therefore partly melts the adjacent hot mantle and cools it slightly. The localization of volcanoes to 100 kilometers (60 miles) above the subducting plate may indicate the breakdown of a specific water bearing mineral, either in the subducting plate or in the adjacent mantle, leading to copious melting. Figure 9. Map on left shows the major peaks of the Cascade Range. The graph on the right shows the eruption history of each volcano over the last 4,000 years. The red line marks 200 years ago, indicating that at least seven volcanoes have been active in historic time. A FLASH-rollover interactive file, Volcanoes Rollover, of this graphic allows you to touch each volcano to get information about each volcano using the above graphics is on IRIS’ website: http://www.iris. edu/hq/programs/ education_and_ outreach/animations/ interactive#W 12 TOTLE workshop Lab 3: Earthquakes at Due Tuesday by 11:59pm Points 25 Submitting a file upload Lab Objectives: • Explain how to determine epicenter distance and location using seismograms • Know the difference between earthquake Magnitude and Intensity Here are instructions on finding epicenter and magnitude. Refer to these instructions to complete the first part of the lab. What You Will Need: . You will need a straight edge (ruler or piece of paper) • You will need to use a drafting compass for Part 1 of the lab. If you do not have access to a compass, here’s a video that shows how to make one using common supplies (the last method in the video shows how to make one to measure a specified radius – needed for this lab) To Complete the Lab: Download this Earthquake Lab Worksheet (Word document or pdf) You will need to write/draw on the worksheet, so you will probably want to print it out, complete the lab, then scan and submit the completed lab worksheet. Earthquake Lab Criteria Ratings Pts Table of distance and S-P intervals 10 pts Full Marks O pts No Marks 10 pts #2 on worksheet: Distance from each city 3 pts O pts No Marks Full Marks 3 pts #4 on worksheet 2 pts Full Marks O pts No Marks What time did the earthquake occur? 2 pts #5 on worksheet What is the Richter magnitude? 2 pts Full Marks O pts No Marks 2 pts #6 on worksheet How did you find the distance to the epicenter? 2 pts Full Marks O pts No Marks 2 pts #7 on worksheet What else do you need to find the location of the earthquake? 2 pts Full Marks O pts No Marks 2 pts Table of Earthquake Intensity 4 pts Full Marks O pts No Marks 4 pts Total Points: 25 Homework: PNW Earthquakes at Start Assignment Due Tuesday by 11:59pm Points 18 Submitting a text entry box or a file upload To prepare for this assignment: Read and view lectures about plate tectonics and earthquakes. Read the assigned article (below). All questions are based on this article. To complete this assignment: Open this worksheet: Seattle EQ assignment (doc or pdf) You will read this paper on Earthquake risk for the Pacific Northwest , then complete the questions on the worksheet. You have 2 options for turning this in; you can write the answers on the worksheet and then save and upload the document to submit it here, or you can paste the answers as text below (make sure your answers are numbered correctly). This assignment includes a sketch: you can either create a simple sketch using application tools, or you can sketch by hand and scan/photograph your hand-drawn sketch and embed it in your worksheet (or submit it as a separate file). Assignment Objectives: • Know the 3 general locations of earthquakes. • Be able to describe the location of the Cascadia subduction zone and the Seattle Fault and the type of earthquakes at each location.

Do you have a similar assignment and would want someone to complete it for you? Click on the ORDER NOW option to get instant services at essayloop.com. We assure you of a well written and plagiarism free papers delivered within your specified deadline.